2 4 6 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION 10 11 |} VARDA ROSE, CASE NO. 20-cv-07461-HSG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO 13 vs. FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A) (iii) 14 || MARJAN KAVEH, D.C.; DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice. The Federal 18 |} Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order 19 || of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose,

(9" Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the 20 || Joint Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice is granted and the Clerk of Court is directed to 21 || close this action. 22 23 || IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 |} DATED: December 28, 2021 25 * HONORABLE JUDGE HAYWOOD 26 S. GILLIAM, JR. 27 78

. we olunf □□□□ □□□□□