United States District Court for the Southern District of California, 2020

St. Sauver v. Byrd-Hunt

St. Sauver v. Byrd-Hunt
United States District Court for the Southern District of California · Decided April 3, 2020
St. Sauver v. Byrd-Hunt

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 Case No.: 3:20-cv-0584-JAH-MDD KENNETH ST. SAUVER BA-5720, ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL 13 ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff, FOR FAILING TO PAY v. FILING FEE REQUIRED 15 BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR BYRD-HUNT; FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED DANIEL PARAMO, IN FORMA PAUPERIS 17 Defendants. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) 20 KENNETH ST. SAUVER (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at Salinas Valley State Prison located in Soledad, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (ECF No. 1).

23 I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status 24 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).1 An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, if the Plaintiff is a prisoner, and even if he is granted leave to commence his suit IFP, he remains obligated to pay the entire filing fee in “increments,” see Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2015), regardless of whether his case is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002).

9 Plaintiff has not prepaid the $400 in filing and administrative fees required to commence this civil action, nor has he submitted a properly supported Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Therefore, his case cannot yet proceed. See 28 12 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Andrews, 493 F.3d at 1051.

13 II. Conclusion and Order 14 For the reasons set forth above, the Court hereby: 15 (1) DISMISSES this action sua sponte without prejudice for failure to pay the $400 civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a); and 18 (2) GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to: (a) prepay the entire $400 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 22 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b).

1 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative fee of $50.

26 See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2014). The additional $50 administrative fee does not apply to persons granted leave to proceed IFP. Id. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall provide Plaintiff || with this Court’s approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed Jn Forma Pauperis.” If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the $400 civil filing fee or ||complete and submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP within 45 days, this action will ||remain dismissed without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to satisfy 28 U.S.C. ||§ 1914(a)’s fee requirements and without further Order of the Court.

7 IT IS SO ORDERED.

10 |) Dated: April 3, 2020 ye VU Lik 11 Hn. John A. Houston Jnited States District Judge ; 290 cv_NS5RA_TAH_MDNDTD)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.