Perez v. McCauley
Perez v. McCauley
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Carlos Perez, Case No.: 19-cv-00670-GPC-LL
12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 13 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE. 14 Kevin McCauley, in his official capacity as a Sheriff Deputy and his individual 15 capacity, 16 Defendant. 17 18 This Order arises from Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee for his Complaint. 19 (ECF No. 1.) All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court 20 of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee 21 of $400. See
28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to 22 prepay the entire fee only if the plaintiff is granted leave to proceed IFP under 28 U.S.C. 23 § 1915(a). See Rodriguez v. Cook,
169 F.3d 1176, 1177(9th Cir. 1999). All actions 24 sought to be filed IFP under § 1915 must be accompanied by an affidavit, signed by the 25 applicant under penalty of perjury, that includes a statement of all assets which shows 26 inability to pay initial fees or give security. Civil Local Rule 3.2.a. 27 / / / 1 Here, Plaintiff filed a complaint on April 10, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) More than one 2 || year has elapsed since the filing of the complaint, and Plaintiff has yet to pay the filing 3 || fee. Consequently, the Court dismisses this Action without prejudice for failure to pay the 4 || mandatory fee. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 apho Ck ) 6 Dated: April 30, 2020 Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel 7 United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown