Williams v. Morales

United States District Court for the Southern District of California

Williams v. Morales

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RENO WILLIAMS, Case No.: 3:20-cv-1053-AJB-KSC CDCR # G-06940, 11 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL Plaintiff, 12 ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE vs. FOR FAILING TO PAY 13 FILING FEE REQUIRED

14 BY

28 U.S.C. § 1914

(a) AND/OR J. MORALES, et al., FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED 15 Defendants. IN FORMA PAUPERIS 16 PURSUANT TO

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)

17 18 19 Plaintiff Reno Williams, proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at Centinela 20 State Prison has filed a civil action. (See ECF No. 1, Compl.) Plaintiff has not prepaid the 21 filing fees required by

28 U.S.C. Section 1914

(a) or filed a motion to proceed in forma 22 pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to

28 U.S.C. Section 1915

(a). 23 I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status 24 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the 25 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 26 27 28 1 $400. See

28 U.S.C. § 1914

(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to 2 prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 3 Section 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes,

493 F.3d 1047, 1051

(9th Cir. 2007); 4 Rodriguez v. Cook,

169 F.3d 1176, 1177

(9th Cir. 1999). However, if the Plaintiff is a 5 prisoner, and even if he is granted leave to commence his suit IFP, he remains obligated 6 to pay the entire filing fee in “increments,” see Williams v. Paramo,

775 F.3d 1182

, 1185 7 (9th Cir. 2015), regardless of whether his case is ultimately dismissed. See

28 U.S.C. § 8

1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore,

281 F.3d 844, 847

(9th Cir. 2002). 9 Plaintiff has not prepaid the $400 in filing and administrative fees required to 10 commence this civil action. Although Plaintiff has filed a copy of his prison trust account 11 statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint as required by 28

12 U.S.C. Section 1915

(a)(2), see ECF No. 3, he has not submitted an affidavit and properly 13 supported Motion to Proceed IFP as required by

28 U.S.C. Section 1915

(a)(1). The more 14 than five month old affidavit attached to Plaintiff’s Complaint, see Compl. at 9, does not 15 satisfy this requirement either. As a result, his case cannot yet proceed. See

28 U.S.C. § 16

1914(a); Andrews,

493 F.3d at 1051

. 17 II. Conclusion and Order 18 For the reasons set forth above, the Court hereby: 19 (1) DISMISSES this action sua sponte without prejudice for failure to pay the 20 $400 civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 21

28 U.S.C. Section 1914

(a) and Section 1915(a); and 22 (2) GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is 23 filed to: (a) prepay the entire $400 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) 24 25 26 1 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional 27 administrative fee of $50. See

28 U.S.C. § 1914

(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. Oct. 1, 2019)). The additional $50 28 1 ||complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP which includes an affidavit of Plaintiff’ s 2 || assets and a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding 3 || the filing of his Complaint. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(1), (2); S.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 3.2(b). 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall provide Plaintiff 5 || with this Court’s approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to 6 || Proceed In Forma Pauperis.” If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the $400 civil filing fee or 7 ||complete and submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP within 45 days, this action will 8 ||remain dismissed without prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to satisfy the fee 9 ||requirements of

28 U.S.C. Section 1914

(a) and without further Order of the Court. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 ||Dated: June 16, 2020 © 12 Hon. Anthony J.Battaglia 13 United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Reference

Status
Unknown