Jones v. Carraby
Trial Court Opinion
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WILLIAM JOSEPH JONES, Case No.: 18-cv-1609-AJB-WVG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER: v. (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND CARRABY, et al., RECOMMENDATION; AND 15 Defendants. (2) DENYING DEFENDANT DR. FOYLE’S MOTION TO DISMISS 17 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 19 (Doc. Nos. 28, 32) Presently before the Court is Defendant Michael Foyle, O.D.’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 28.) The Court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo for a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), which was issued on December 30, 2019. (Doc.
No. 32.) The R&R recommends that Defendant’s motion be denied. (Id. at 9.) The parties were instructed to file written objections to the R&R by January 18, 2020, and a reply to the objections no later than February 8, 2020. (Id. at 9–10.)
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) set forth a district judge’s duties in connection with a magistrate judge’s R&R. The district judge must “make 1 de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made[,]” 2 “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Remsing, 874 F.2d 4 ||614, 617 (9th Cir. 1989). However, in the absence of objection(s), the Court “need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the || recommendation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee note to the 1983 amendment; || United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (th Cir. 2003).
8 Neither party has filed objections to Magistrate Judge Gallo’s R&R. Having ||reviewed the R&R, the Court finds it thorough, well-reasoned, and contains no clear error.
10 || Accordingly, the Court hereby: (1) ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Gallo’s R&R in its entirety; 11 (2) DENIES Defendant’s motion to dismiss.
13 || IT IS SO ORDERED.
13 |! Dated: July 9, 2020 | | □□ rz Le 16 Hon, Anthony J.Battaglia 17 United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.