1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VERONICA OLLIER, et al., Case No.: 07-cv-00714-L-JLB

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND 13 v. RECOMMENDATION 14 SWEETWATER UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 Pending before the Court in this action alleging violations of Title IX of the 18 Education Amendments of 1972,

et seq. (“Title IX”) is a Report and 19 Recommendation (“R&R”) issued by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt (doc. no. 352), 20 recommending to grant the Joint Motion to Withdraw Enforcement Motion and Vacate 21 Order to Show Cause (doc. no. 346), approve the withdrawal of Plaintiffs’ Motion to 22 Enforce Permanent Injunction (doc. no. 225), and discharge the Order to Show Cause 23 Why Defendant Should Not Be Held in Contempt (doc. no. 249). No objections have 24 been filed to the R&R. 25 A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition" on a 26 dispositive matter prepared by a magistrate judge proceeding without the consent of the 27 parties for all purposes. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); see

(b)(1). "[T]he court 28 shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] 1 || to which objection is made."

(b)(1). When no objections are filed, the de 2 ||novo review is waived. Section 636(b)(1) does not require review by the district court 3 under a lesser standard. Thomas v. Arn,

(1985). The "statute 4 || makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and 5 recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise." United States v. 6 || Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (emphasis in original). 7 In the absence of objections, the Court adopts the R&R. Accordingly, the Joint 8 || Motion to Withdraw Enforcement Motion and Vacate Order to Show Cause (doc. no. 9 || 346) is granted, including the request to withdraw of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Enforce 10 || Permanent Injunction (doc. no. 225), and discharge the Order to Show Cause Why 11 || Defendant Should Not Be Held in Contempt (doc. no. 249). 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 Dated: July 28, 2020

15 H . James Lorenz, 6 United States District Judge

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28