United States District Court for the Southern District of California, 2020

Sebastian v. One Brands, LLC

Sebastian v. One Brands, LLC
United States District Court for the Southern District of California · Decided August 11, 2020
Sebastian v. One Brands, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA |} BRITTANY SEBASTIAN, individually Case No.: 20cv0009-L-MDD ll and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION 13 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT 14 ONE BRANDS LLC et al., Toots. S MOTION 15 Defendant.

17 Pending before the Court is Defendant Hershey Company’s (“Hershey”) motion to || dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) for lack of personal ||jurisdiction. (Doc. no. 10). Plaintiff filed a notice of non-opposition. (Doc. no. 17.)

20 || Hershey's motion is therefore granted as unopposed. See Civ. Loc. Rule 7.1.f.3.c; || Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53-54 (9th Cir. 1995). All claims asserted against || Defendant Hershey Company are dismissed without prejudice.

23 IT IS SO ORDERED.

24 Dated: August 10, 2020 wu oer ftp 6 H . James Lorenz, United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.