Sebastian v. One Brands, LLC
Trial Court Opinion
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA |} BRITTANY SEBASTIAN, individually Case No.: 20cv0009-L-MDD ll and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION 13 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT 14 ONE BRANDS LLC et al., Toots. S MOTION 15 Defendant.
17 Pending before the Court is Defendant Hershey Company’s (“Hershey”) motion to || dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) for lack of personal ||jurisdiction. (Doc. no. 10). Plaintiff filed a notice of non-opposition. (Doc. no. 17.)
20 || Hershey's motion is therefore granted as unopposed. See Civ. Loc. Rule 7.1.f.3.c; || Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53-54 (9th Cir. 1995). All claims asserted against || Defendant Hershey Company are dismissed without prejudice.
23 IT IS SO ORDERED.
24 Dated: August 10, 2020 wu oer ftp 6 H . James Lorenz, United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.