United States District Court for the Southern District of California, 2020

Murschel v. Paramo

Murschel v. Paramo
United States District Court for the Southern District of California · Decided October 20, 2020
Murschel v. Paramo

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Lance MURSCHEL, Case No.: 17-cv-1142-BTM-AGS 11 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN v. Daniel PARAMO, et al., 14 Defendants.

16 By November 17, 2020, the parties must provide the Court with a Joint Discovery Plan. The JDP must be filed on the CM/ECF system and lodged with Magistrate Judge Schopler by emailing it to [email protected]. Because defendants raised the issue of failure to exhaust, the Plan should offer a brief schedule to adjudicate that issue before moving on to general discovery. See Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1170 (9th Cir. 2014) (“Exhaustion should be decided, if feasible, before reaching the merits of a prisoner’s claim.”). The JDP must identify if good cause exists to modify the Court’s tentative schedule of deadlines, which is as follows: 1 Event Deadline 2 Defense Counsel Receiving and December 8, 2020 Serving All Grievances on File at the Institution 4 Plaintiff’s Deposition, not limited By January 15, 2021 solely to issues of exhaustion Any Motions Concerning January 29, 2021 6 Exhaustion or Requests for Albino Hearing Motions to Amend February 16, 2021 Expert Witness Designations and April 30, 2021 9 Disclosures 10 Rebuttal Expert Witness May 28, 2021 Designations and Disclosures Expert Discovery Completion June 25, 2021 Fact Discovery Completion June 25, 2021 MSC Briefs July 2, 2021 Mandatory Settlement Conference July 9, 2021, at 9:00 a.m.

Pretrial Motions July 26, 2021 Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures October 1, 2021 Meet and Confer on the PTO October 8, 2021 Draft PTO to Defense Counsel October 15, 2021 Lodge PTO October 22, 2021 Final Pretrial Conference October 29, 2021, at 11:00 a.m.

Discovery Type Restriction Depositions No more than 4 Requests for Admission No more than 15 Interrogatories No more than 15 Requests to Produce Documents No more than 15 1 Defense counsel is responsible for contacting plaintiff to prepare the joint discovery plan 2 should plaintiff be incarcerated at the relevant time, for ensuring □□□□□□□□□□□ || participation in any telephonic or in-person hearings.

5 ||Dated: October 20, 2020 4 Hon. Andrew G. Schopler United States Magistrate Judge 1]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.