Allen v. Quillen

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL DEWAYNE ALLEN, Case No. 20cv2192-MMA (DEB) CDCR#T-55834, ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL Plaintiffs, 13 ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE vs. FOR FAILING TO PAY FILING FEE REQUIRED C.O. QUILLEN, et al., 15 BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR Defendants. FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 17 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) 19 Plaintiff Michael Dewayne Allen, a state prisoner incarcerated at the R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility proceeding pro se, has filed a civil right complaint pursuant to 42 21 U.S.C. § 1983. See Doc. No. 1. Plaintiff has not prepaid the $400 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and has not filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

24 I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status 25 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s (“PLRA”) amendments to § 1915 require that all prisoners who proceed IFP to pay the entire fee in “increments” or “installments,” Bruce v. Samuels, __ U.S. __, 136 S. Ct. 5 627, 629 (2016); Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2015), and regardless of whether their action is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002).

8 Section 1915(a)(2) requires all persons seeking to proceed without full prepayment of fees to file an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets possessed and demonstrates an inability to pay. See Escobedo v. Applebee’s, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015). In support of this affidavit, the PLRA also requires prisoners to submit a “certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for . . . the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1119 (9th Cir. 2005). From the certified trust account statement, the Court assesses an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in the account for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly balance in the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner has no assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). The institution having custody of the prisoner then collects subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of the preceding month’s income, in any month in which his account exceeds $10, and forwards those payments to the Court until the entire filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2); Bruce, 136 S. Ct. at 629.

23 Because Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) to commence a civil action, nor filed a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), his case cannot proceed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Andrews, 493 F.3d at 1051.

26 // // // 1 Conclusion and Order 2 Accordingly, the Court: 3 (1) DISMISSES this action without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to pay 4 filing fee or file a Motion to Proceed /FP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and || 1915(a).

6 (2) GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is 7 to: (a) prepay the entire civil filing fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b).

9 (3) DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to provide Plaintiff with the Court’s 10 approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma || Pauperis.”! If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the civil filing fee or fully complete and |}submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed JFP within 45 days, this action will remain || dismissed without prejudice based on his failure to satisfy 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)’s fee ||requirement and without further Order of the Court.

15 IT IS SO ORDERED.

16 || DATE: November 17, 2020 Ll. f DTU _ / □□ 17 HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO 18 United States District Judge 24 SSS 29 Plaintiff is cautioned that if he chooses to proceed further by submitting a properly supported Motion to || Proceed IFP, his Complaint will be screened before service and may be dismissed sua sponte pursuant to U.S.C. § 1915A(b). See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-27 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (noting that 27 U.S.C. § 1915(e) “not only permits but requires” the court to sua sponte dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint that is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks damages from defendants who are immune).