Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 Case No.: 11cv1810 DMS (WVG) IN RE: AMERANTH PATENT LITIGATION CASES, ORDER FOLLOWING STATUS 13 CONFERENCE 16 A telephonic status conference was held on December 2, 2021. After hearing from counsel for the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The stay imposed in the Court’s October 23, 2020 Order (ECF No. 1491) is lifted.

19 2. Consistent with In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litig., 639 F.3d 1303, 1311-13 (Fed. Cir. 2011), and Nuance Communications, Inc. v. ABBYY USA Software House, Inc., 813 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2016), Ameranth is ordered to show cause why it should be allowed to reassert any claims that were not selected in response to the Court’s February 14, 2017 Order. (See ECF No. 623) (directing Ameranth to select up to five claims for assertion against each Defendant). Ameranth shall file its response to this order on or before December 9, 2021. Defendants shall file an omnibus brief in response to / / / / / / / / / || Ameranth’s brief on or before December 16, 2021. The parties’ briefs on this issue shall || be no more than fifteen (15) pages, respectively.

3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

4 ||Dated: December 2, 2021 em Dh 5 an Yn.

Hon. Dana M. Sabraw, Chief Judge 6 United States District Court 1]