United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

(PC) Williams v. Sherman

(PC) Williams v. Sherman
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided January 4, 2021
(PC) Williams v. Sherman

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID WILLIAMS, ) Case No. 1:19-cv-01181-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

) CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO V. ) REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL STUART SHERMAN, et al., RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Defendants. ) (ECF No. 33) The parties participated in a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge McAuliffe December 10, 2020 during which they resolved the claims in this action. Judge McAuliffe agreed | retain jurisdiction over the settlement for 180 days. On December 30, 2020, the parties filed a stipulatic for voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this actic has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9 Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice.

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case ar adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). IT IS FURTHE ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the matter for 180 days. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Al (re Dated: _ January 4, 2021 OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.