Haro v. County of Stanislaus
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANDREW HARO and MARGARITA Case No. 1:20-CV-00095-NONE-EPG ANAYA, Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH v. PREJUDICE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., (ECF No. 24) Defendants.
Plaintiffs Andrew Haro and Margarita Anaya and Defendant County of Stanislaus have filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF No. 24). In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case.
[T IS SO ORDERED. * Eu Po Lheβ Dated: _ January 6, 2021 /s/ 0 hey β UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.