United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

(SS) Moreno v. Commissioner of Social Security

(SS) Moreno v. Commissioner of Social Security
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided January 14, 2021
(SS) Moreno v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

Jonathan O. Peña, Esq.

CA Bar ID No.: 278044 Peña & Bromberg, PLC 2440 Tulare St., Ste. 320 Fresno, CA 93721 Telephone: 559-439-9700 Facsimile: 559-439-9723 Email: [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiff, Juanita Moreno

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION JUANITA MORENO, Case No. 1:20-cv-00335-SKO

Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD

AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY

v. FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT

TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of JUSTICE ACT; ORDER Social Security,

(Doc. 19)

Defendant.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $ 5,808.43, under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Counsel, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel, Jonathan O. Peña.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Counsel including Counsel’s firm may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Counsel and/or Counsel’s firm to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: January 13, 2021 /s/ Jonathan O. Peña

J ONATHAN O. PEÑA Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: January 13, 2021 McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

By: Ellinor R. Coder*

Ellinor R. Coder Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant (*Permission to use electronic signature obtained via email on January 13, 2021). ORDER

Based upon the parties’ above Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees and Expenses (Doc. 19) (the “Stipulation”), IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $5,808.43, as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto Dated: January 14, 2021 /s/ .

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.