(PC) Lear v. McConnell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RODERICK WILLIAM LEAR, No. 1:20-cv-00076-AWI-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER OF VOLUNTARILY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE UNDER FED. R. CIV. v. P. 41(A)(1)(A)(ii) ROBIN MCCONNELL, ET. AL.

Defendants.

On February 2, 2021, the parties’ filed a “Joint Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice,” stipulating to dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with prejudice, noting that the parties have resolved the case in its entirety, and further noting each party bears their own attorneys’ fees and costs. See Doc. No. 39. Considering the parties’ Joint Stipulation under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this case is dismissed with prejudice. See Id.; see also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Stipulation (Doc. No. 39) this is action is dismissed with prejudice.

2. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate any pending motions and close this case. > | tris so ORDERED.

Dated: _ February 3, 2021 oo. WN fared Yack ‘ HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE i