(PC) Ruiz v. Leon

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

(PC) Ruiz v. Leon

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 2:19-cv-2201 JAM CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 D. LEON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42

18 U.S.C. § 1983

. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed with this action in forma pauperis 19 pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

. 20 On January 22, 2021, plaintiff filed a request that the court appoint plaintiff a Spanish 21 interpreter. The expenditure of public funds on behalf of an indigent litigant is proper only when 22 authorized by Congress. Tedder v. Odel,

890 F.2d 210

(9th Cir. 1989). The in forma pauperis 23 statute does not authorize the expenditure of public funds for interpreters, see

28 U.S.C. § 1915

, 24 and the court is not aware of any other authority that does. 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs request that the court appoint 2 | hima Spanish interpreter (ECF No. 16) is denied. 3 | Dated: February 9, 2021 Pe ed if / /, CAN fu fl. ay 4 CAROLYN K. DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8] 4 9 miz2201.31.c

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown