(HC) Jackson v. Martinez

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA YONNIE JACKSON, No. 2:17-cv-01311-TLN-CKD 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER JOSE MARTINEZ, 15 Respondent.

17 Petitioner Yonnie Jackson (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20 On January 6, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 31.)

23 Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.

26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

27 /// /// 1 Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be || supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 6, 2021 (ECF No. 31), are | ADOPTED IN FULL; and 6 2. Petitioner’s motion for immediate release (ECF No. 28) is DENIED.

7 IT IS SO ORDERED.

8 | Dated: February 15, 2021 9 {~ /) 10 “ ! lu Troy L. Nuhlep ] 2 United States District Judge