United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

(SS) Myrick v. Commissioner of Social Security

(SS) Myrick v. Commissioner of Social Security
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided March 10, 2021
(SS) Myrick v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAMALA J. MYRICK, No. 1:19-cv-01659-GSA

Plaintiff,

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE v. AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES

PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS ANDREW SAUL,

Commissioner of Social Security, TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. Defendant. § 1920

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED TWENTY EIGHT DOLLARS AND FIFTY

SEVEN CENTS ($5,328.57) and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920 in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($400.00). These amounts represent compensation for all legal services rendered and costs incurred on behalf of Plaintiff, to date, by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d) and 1920.

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff's attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees, expenses are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees and expenses is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees and expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees to be made directly to the Metsker Law Firm, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with this action.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: March 9, 2021 /s/ John David Metsker

John David Metsker

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: March 9, 2021 /s/ Ellinor Ravenel Coder* ELLINOR RAVENEL CODER *As authorized via email on March 9, 2021

Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation,

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 10, 2021 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.