(PS) Pearson v. Icanotes-EHR
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NICOLE PEARSON, No. 2:20-cv-1720 KJM DB PS
Plaintiff, v. ORDER
ICANOTES-EHR, et al.,
Defendants,
Plaintiff Nicole Pearson is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On March 1, 2021, plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 13.)
Plaintiff also filed a request seeking an order sealing this action. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff’s request, however, does not make the necessary showing to justify sealing this action. See Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir. 2016) (party seeking to seal judicial records normally bears the burden of overcoming strong presumption in favor of public access by showing compelling reasons). Nonetheless, out of an abundance of caution, the undersigned will order that this action be un-filed. //// ////
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiffs March 1, 2021 request to seal (ECF No. 14) is denied; 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to un-file and remove the complaint from the case; 3. Plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed this action; and 4. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case.
Dated: March 10, 2021
ORAH BARNES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DLB:6
35 DB/orders/orders.pro se/pearson1720.unfile.ord
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.