(PC) Williams v. Sacramento County

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES WILLIAMS, No. 2:20-cv-01513-TLN-JDP

Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY,

Defendants.

Plaintiff Charles Williams (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On January 22, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 22, 2021 (ECF No. 7), are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, and for failure to state a claim as set forth in the September 29, 2020 Order; and

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 19, 2021

( f “ ! J Vu Troy L. Nunley □ United States District Judge