(HC) Hanrahan v. Oddo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT HANRAHAN, No. 2:19-cv-00641-TLN-KJN

Petitioner, v. ORDER

L.J. ODDO,

Respondent.

Petitioner Robert Hanrahan (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On February 1, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days. (ECF No. 29.) Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed February 01, 2021 (ECF No. 29), are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The § 2241 petition is DISMISSED; and

3. The Court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 19, 2021 /) “ | / bun

I Troy L. Nunley ] United States District Judge