United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

(PC) Demisi v. Phan

(PC) Demisi v. Phan
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided March 22, 2021
(PC) Demisi v. Phan

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MOHAMMAD KHALID DEMISI, No. 2:20-cv-01692-TLN-DMC

Plaintiff, v. ORDER STEPHANIE PHAN, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff Mohammad Khalid Demisi (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On January 25, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 12.) No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 25, 2021 (ECF No. 12), are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 19, 2021

( jf “ ! J Vu Troy L. Nuhlep ] Db United States District Judge

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.