(PC) Garraway v. Ciufo
Trial Court Opinion
3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6 MITCHELL GARRAWAY, 1:17-cv-00533-DAD-GSA-PC 7 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TRIAL DATE AS PREMATURE 8 vs. (ECF No. 123.)
9 JACQUILINE CIUFO, et al., 10 Defendants.
12 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s original Complaint filed on April 17, 2017, against defendants Jacqueline Ciufo (Unit Manager), K. Miller (Corrections Officer), and Lieutenant J. Zaragoza (collectively, “Defendants”), for failure to protect Plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
17 (ECF No. 1.)
18 On March 8, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the court to schedule a trial date for this case. (ECF No. 123.) Plaintiff’s motion is premature. The court shall not schedule a trial in this case before the pending settlement conference scheduled in this case for May 25, 2021, has been resolved.
22 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to schedule a trial for this case, filed on March 8, 2021, is denied as premature.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26 Dated: March 30, 2021 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.