1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HUNG M NGUYEN, No. 2:21-cv-00239-TLN-KJN 12 Plaintiff, ORDER

13 v. 14 YOLO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, 15 Defendant. 16

17 18 Plaintiff Hung M. Nguyen (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was 19 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 20 302(c)(21). 21 On March 11, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 22 served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 23 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 4.) On March 17, 2021, 24 Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 5), which have been 25 considered by the Court. 26 In accordance with the provisions of

(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304(f), this 27 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 28 Business Machines,

(9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied,

(1982); see 1 | also Dawson v. Marshall,

(9th Cir. 2009). Having reviewed the file under the 2 || applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by 3 | the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. The Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 4) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 6 2. Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 7 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 8 ITIS SO ORDERED. 9 | DATED: April 13, 2021 '0 /) iol Tooke

B Troy L. Nunley . } United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28