United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

(SS) Madrid v. Commissioner of Social Security

(SS) Madrid v. Commissioner of Social Security
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided April 13, 2021
(SS) Madrid v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

1 FORSLUND LAW, LLC Jacqueline A. Forslund # 154575 P.O. Box 4476 Sunriver, OR 97707 Telephone: 541-419-0074 Fax: 541-593-4452 Email: [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiff 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRANK FERNANDO MADRID, ) Case No. 2:19-CV-01421-KJM-KJN ) 10 Plaintiff ) STIPULATION AND ) ORDER FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S v. ) FEES AND COSTS PURSUANT TO ) 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920 AND 2412(d).

ANDREW M. SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) 14 Defendant ) ) ____________________________________) IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of SIX THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED dollars and ZERO cents ($6,500.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of four hundred dollars ($400.00) under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 22 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d).

After the Court issues an order for payment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff’s attorney. The government’s ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees and expenses are subject to an offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program pursuant to Astrue v. Ratcliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010). After the order of EAJA fees and expenses is entered, the government will determine if they are subject to an offset.

1 If it is determined that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees and expenses are not subject to an offset under Astrue v. Ratcliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010), and the Department of Treasury’s Offset Program, then the check for EAJA fees and expenses shall be made payable to Jacqueline A. Forslund, based upon Plaintiff’s assignment of these amounts to Plaintiff’s attorney.

The parties agree that whether these checks are made payable to Plaintiff or Jacqueline A.

Forslund, such checks shall be mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney.

The parties further agree that the check for costs shall be made payable to Frank Fernando Madrid, but mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney. After Plaintiff’s attorney receives the check for costs, she will forward the check to Plaintiff.

9 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s Counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

Respectfully submitted, Date: April 12, 2021 JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND 16 Attorney at Law

18 /s/Jacqueline A. Forslund JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND 19 Attorney for Plaintiff Date: April 12, 2021 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT 21 United States Attorney DEBORAH STACHEL 22 Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 24 /s/Michael Marriott MICHAEL MARRIOTT 25 Special Assistant United States Attorney *By email authorization Attorney for Defendant eee IOI IE EI OIE ONE I EO EO ORDER APPROVED AND SO ORDERED |)Dated: April 13, 2021 Frese Abr madr.1421 6 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Madrid v. Saul Stipulation and Order E.D. Cal. 2:19-cv-01421-KJM-KJN

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.