United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

(PC) Foust v. Ogboona

(PC) Foust v. Ogboona
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided June 14, 2021
(PC) Foust v. Ogboona

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARL FOUST, No. 2:20-cv-2229-JAM-EFB P

Plaintiff, v. ORDER

A. OGBOONA,

Defendant.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 25, 2021, the court granted his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, obligating him to pay the filing fee in full through monthly payments. ECF No. 32; 28 20 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff now seeks to be refunded the portion of the filing fee that he has already paid because the court recommended that his case be dismissed (ECF No. 38). ECF No. 40.

Plaintiff is not entitled to a refund. His request is denied and he remains obligated to pay the entire filing fee “in increments.” Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2015); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002) (“Under the PLRA, all prisoners who file IFP civil actions must pay the full amount of the filing fee.”). ///// ] Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's May 3, 2021 request (ECF No. 40) is denied.

DATED: June 14, 2021. tid, PDEA

EDMUND F. BRENNAN ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1]

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.