(PC) Anderson v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIC Z. ANDERSON, No. 2:21-cv-0749 CKD P

Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND UNKNOWN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendant.

On May 5, 2021, plaintiff was granted 30 days within which to file a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file a complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has not responded to the May 5, 2021 order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: June 14, 2021 Card ke yy a

CAROLYN K DELANEY? UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9} 1 ande0749.dis 1]