(PC) Anderson v. Unknown

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ERIC Z. ANDERSON, No. 2:21-cv-0749 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND UNKNOWN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendant.

17 On May 5, 2021, plaintiff was granted 30 days within which to file a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file a complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has not responded to the May 5, 2021 order.

21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and | Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time || waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

4 | Dated: June 14, 2021 Card ke yy a 5 CAROLYN K DELANEY?

6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9} 1 10 ande0749.dis 1]