United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

(PC) Clifton v. Curry

(PC) Clifton v. Curry
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided April 9, 2021
(PC) Clifton v. Curry

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM CLIFTON Case No. 2:20-cv-02149-JAM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR v. FAILURE TO PAY THE FILING FEE

M. CURRY, et al., OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS

Defendants.

On December 8, 2020, the court denied plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and ordered plaintiff to pay the $400 filing fee within twenty-one days. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff was warned that failure to timely pay the filing fee would result in this action being dismissed without prejudice. To date, plaintiff has not submitted the required filing fee. Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the $400 filing fee.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days of being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days of service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 3 1153 (th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _ April 8, 2021

JEREMY D. PETERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.