(PC) Chandler v. County of Shasta

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL BRIAN CHANDLER, Case No. 2:21-cv-00137-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR 13 v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS COUNTY OF SHASTA, et al., RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE 15 Defendants. DAYS 17 On January 28, 2021, plaintiff was directed to either pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff subsequently filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, but he failed to submit the required certified copy of his jail trust account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Accordingly, on February 26, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to submit, within thirty days, a certified copy of his trust account statement or the institutional equivalent. ECF No. 6. To date, plaintiff has not submitted a copy of his trust account statement nor otherwise responded to the February 26, 2021 order.

25 To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres.

28 Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, | 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but a district court has a duty to | administer justice expeditiously and avoid needless burden for the parties. See Pagtalunan v. | Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002); Fed. R. Civ. P. 1.

4 Plaintiff will be given a chance to explain why the court should not dismiss the case for | his failure to file a certified copy of his trust account statement as required by 28 U.S.C. | § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiffs failure to respond to this order will constitute another failure to comply | with a court order and will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

8 | Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to show cause within twenty-one days why this case should not | be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. Should plaintiff | wish to continue with this action, he shall, within twenty-one days, either pay the $402 filing fee | or submit a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis together with a certified | copy of his inmate trust account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the | filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). The Clerk of Court is directed to send to | plaintiff the court’s form application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

16 IT IS SO ORDERED.

17 ( 1 Sy — Dated: _ April 22, 2021 18 JEREMY D. PETERSON 19 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE