United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

(PC) Blackman v. Pollard

(PC) Blackman v. Pollard
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided April 27, 2021
(PC) Blackman v. Pollard

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TONY BLACKMAN, No. 2: 21-cv-0164 JAM KJN P

Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS M. POLLARD, et al.,

Defendants.

By order filed March 22, 2021, plaintiff was granted thirty days to pay the filing fee. (ECF No. 9.) Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that //// //// failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: April 27, 2021

‘ Frese Arn

KENDALL J. NE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Blackl6d.tr

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.