United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

(PC) Sanders v. Grimes

(PC) Sanders v. Grimes
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided June 24, 2021
(PC) Sanders v. Grimes

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TROY ALEXANDER SANDERS, Case No. 1:18-cv-01285-AWI-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE v.

GRIMES, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff has filed a request for voluntary dismissal without prejudice. (Doc. 54.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), a “plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Once a dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is properly filed, no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal; the dismissal is effective automatically. Com. Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999). Because Plaintiff has filed a notice of dismissal, and no opposing party has filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, this action has terminated. Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to terminate all pending motions and to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 24, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.