United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

(PC) Foster v. Kitty

(PC) Foster v. Kitty
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided May 11, 2021
(PC) Foster v. Kitty

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARTIN LEE FOSTER, No. 2:21-cv-0346 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND 13 v. FINDIGNS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KITTY, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 On, March 26, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to submit, within thirty days, a certified copy of his jail trust account statement for the past six months and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in dismissal. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order.

21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified || time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th | Cir. 1991).

3 || Dated: May 11, 2021 a] Ld Ai.

Cat pK. Ager 4 CAROLYNK.DELANEY / 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 fost0346.tsa

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.