(PC) Reyes v. Matteson

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRAULIO ULISES REYES, Case No. 2:20-cv-00815-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR 13 v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM GISELLE MATTESON, RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE 15 Defendants. DAYS 18 On November 10, 2020, the court screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint, notified plaintiff that it did not state a claim, and granted plaintiff thirty days to file a second amended complaint. ECF No. 17. Plaintiff was subsequently granted two sixty-day extensions, with the most recent extension granting plaintiff until April 19, 2021 to file an amended complaint. ECF Nos. 19, 21. Despite those extensions, plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint.

23 To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres.

26 Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but a district court has a duty to | administer justice expeditiously and avoid needless burden for the parties. See Pagtalunan v. | Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002); Fed. R. Civ. P. 1.

3 I will give plaintiff a chance to explain why the court should not dismiss the case for his | failure to file an amended complaint. Plaintiffs failure to respond to this order will constitute a | failure to comply with a court order and will result in a recommendation that this action be | dismissed. Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to show cause within twenty-one days why this case | should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to state a claim. Should plaintiff wish | to continue with this lawsuit, he shall file, within twenty-one days, a second amended complaint.

10 IT IS SO ORDERED. ll ( ie — Dated: _ May 4, 2021 q_——— 12 JEREMY D. PETERSON 3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE