(PS) Hyon v. Brown

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 Junho Hyon, No. 2:19-cv-00259-KJM-EFB 12 Plaintiff, 13 Vv. ORDER | Jerry Brown et al., 15 Defendant.

17 The court received Mr. Hyon’s filing at ECF No. 31 and construes it as a motion for | clarification under Federal Rule 60(a). See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) || (“document filed pro se is ‘to be liberally construed’”) (citations omitted). Mr. Hyon states he || was unable to find a document the “US Court of Appeal in San Francisco sent [the court] on || September 25, 2020.” The court is unaware of the document Mr. Hyon references, and the court | has no record on its docket of any United States Court of Appeals filing on that date. As the court || cannot identify an error within its control, the motion is denied.

24 | DATED: April 30, 2021.

4 CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE