United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

(PC) Norsworthy v. Diaz

(PC) Norsworthy v. Diaz
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided May 10, 2021
(PC) Norsworthy v. Diaz

Trial Court Opinion

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHELLE-LAEL B. NORSWORTHY, Case No. 1:20-cv-00813-DAD-HBK 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT vs. (Doc. No. 39) RALPH DIAZ, et al., 11 Defendants.

Before the court is the parties’ stipulation for plaintiff to file her first amended complaint, incorporating motion to extend deadline to file amended complaint and attaching proposed amended complaint filed April 29, 2021. (Doc. No. 39). The court’s scheduling order set a December 12, 2020 deadline to amend the pleadings. (Doc. No. 31 at 2).

Under Local Rule 144, the parties are required to receive court approval for extending deadlines set by the court, and untimely extension requests are disfavored. The Ninth Circuit has held that such requests should be evaluated under the good cause standard of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4). Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co., 232 F.3d 1271, 1294 (9th Cir. 2000). That rule states that “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge's consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4).

The court finds plaintiff has demonstrated good cause. Plaintiff’s counsel represents they began discussions with defense counsel in October 2020 regarding filing an amended complaint. (Doc. No. 29-3 ¶ 2). A pandemic induced lockdown at plaintiff’s prison from Fall 2020 into Winter 2021 thwarted plaintiff’s ability to timely amend her complaint because plaintiff’s counsel was unable to digitally meet with her until January 7, 2021. (Id. ¶ 4). The finalization of the amended complaint was further hindered by setbacks to plaintiff’s mental health. (Id. ¶ 5). Plaintiff represents defendants were apprised of these delays, and defense counsel stipulates to the filing of an amended complaint. (Id. ¶¶ 1 7-10). Because the delays appear beyond plaintiff’s control, the court finds good cause to permit || plaintiff an extension of time to file her amended complaint.

3 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 4 1. Plaintiff's motion to extend deadline to file amended complaint incorporated within the 5 parties’ Stipulation (Doc. No. 39) is GRANTED.

6 2. Plaintiff shall file her First Amended Complaint in the form attached to the Stipulation 7 within five (5) days of the date of this Order and serve a copy of the same upon Defendants.

8 3. Defendants’ responsive pleadings to the First Amended Complaint is due no later than 9 twenty-one (21) days after service is effectuated upon Defendant Secretary Allison.

IT IS SO ORDERED. * WDated: _ May 10,2021 Mile. Wh fareh Zaskth 13 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA 4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.