(PC) Miron v. Jackson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARON MIRON, No. 2:21-cv-0501 KJM KJN P

Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

JACKSON,

Defendant.

By order filed March 22, 2021, plaintiff was informed that his proposed complaint was incomplete and did not bear his signature. He was granted thirty days leave to file a complete complaint bearing his signature. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Thirty days from the order passed, and plaintiff has not filed a complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: May 4, 2021 ‘ Frese Arn

KENDALL J. NE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE miro0501.tta