United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

(HC) Jones v. Sullivan

(HC) Jones v. Sullivan
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided May 20, 2021
(HC) Jones v. Sullivan

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CORNELIUS L. JONES, No. 2:19-cv-1160 WBS DB P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER W. J. SULLIVAN, 15 Respondent.

17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges his 2014 convictions for attempted murder, assault with a deadly weapon, and assault likely to cause great bodily injury. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

22 On March 18, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

26 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

28 //// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 17, 2021, are adopted in full; 3 2. Petitioner’s motion to lift the stay (ECF No. 22) is granted; 4 3. The stay pursuant to Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2003) is lifted; 5 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to reopen this action; and 6 5. Respondent shall file a response to the amended petition within sixty (60) days of the | date of this Order. .

8 | Dated: May 19, 2021 bitte Ah ha bee WILLIAM B. SHUBB 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 Jone1160/801.he

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.