(PC) Crump v. O'Campo

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1] STEVE CRUMP, No. 2:20-cv-2343 JAM KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 Vv. ORDER 14 A. OCAMPO, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis with an action brought | under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 24, 2021, plaintiff renewed his motion for preliminary || injunction. However, on March 15, 2021, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations | addressing plaintiff's earlier motion for preliminary injunction, which was adopted by the district | court on May 3, 2021, over plaintiffs objections. Plaintiff's renewed motion includes no new | factual allegations, and fails to address any of the elements required under Winter v. Natural || Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008). Rather, in his one paragraph motion, | plaintiff simply repeats claims previously raised. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that | plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 44) is denied without prejudice.

26 || Dated: May 27, 2021 /ow/erum2343.pi2 Frees Aharon 28 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE