United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

(SS) Tara Fae Alexander v. Commissioner of Social Security

(SS) Tara Fae Alexander v. Commissioner of Social Security
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided June 8, 2021
(SS) Tara Fae Alexander v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

FORSLUND LAW, LLC

Jacqueline A. Forslund # 154575

P.O. Box 4476

Sunriver, OR 97707

Telephone: 541-419-0074

Fax: 541-593-4452

Email: [email protected]

Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TARA FAE ALEXANDER, ) Case No. 1:19-cv-01208-SKO )

Plaintiff ) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR ) AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES v. ) UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO ) JUSTICE ACT (EAJA)

ANDREW M. SAUL, )

Commissioner of Social Security, ) (Doc. 23) )

Defendant ) ) ____________________________________)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412(d), in the amount of SIX THOUSAND dollars and ZERO cents ($6,000.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. sec. 21 2412(d).

After the Court issues an order for payment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff’s attorney. The government’s ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees and expenses are subject to an offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program pursuant to Astrue v. Ratcliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). After the order of EAJA fees and expenses is entered, the government will determine if they are subject to an offset. If it is determined that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees and expenses are not subject to an offset under Astrue v. Ratcliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010) and the Department of Treasury’s Offset Program, then the check for EAJA fees and expenses shall be made payable to Jacqueline A. Forslund, based upon Plaintiff’s assignment of these amounts to Plaintiff’s attorney. The parties agree that whether these checks are made payable to Plaintiff or Jacqueline A. Forslund, such checks shall be mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney. This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s Counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

Respectfully submitted,

Date: June 7, 2021 JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND

Attorney at Law

/s/Jacqueline A. Forslund

JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND

Attorney for Plaintiff

Date: June 7, 2021 PHILIP A. TALBERT

Acting United States Attorney

DEBORAH STACHEL

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration /s/ Marcel Illarmo

MARCELO ILLARMO

Special Assistant United States Attorney *By email authorization

Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

Based upon the parties’ above Stipulation for Award of Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) (the “Stipulation”) (Doc. 23),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $6,000.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

Dated: June 8, 2021 /s/ .

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.