(PC) Andrews v. Allison

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA YANCY ROBERT ANDREWS, No. 2:21-cv-0331 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants.

17 On April 20, 2021, plaintiff was given thirty days within which to file an amended complaint and completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the April 20, 2021 order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order.

21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and | Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time || waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

4 | Dated: June 3, 2021 Card ke yy a 5 CAROLYN K DELANEY?

6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9} 1 10 andr033 1.fta 1]