United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

(HC) Kuykendall v. Unknown

(HC) Kuykendall v. Unknown
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided June 28, 2021
(HC) Kuykendall v. Unknown

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN KUYKENDALL, Case No. 2:21-cv-00924-WBS-JDP (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA 13 v. PAUPERIS UNKNOWN, ECF No. 8 15 Respondent. ORDER FINDING THAT THE PETITION DOES NOT STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM 16 AND GIVING LEAVE TO AMEND WITHIN SIXTY DAYS ECF No. 1 19 Petitioner is confined at Napa State Hospital and seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 20 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. The petition is before me for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Under Rule 4, the judge assigned to the habeas proceeding must examine the habeas petition and order a response to the petition unless it “plainly appears” that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. See Valdez v. Montgomery, 918 F.3d 687, 693 (9th Cir. 2019); Boyd v. Thompson, 147 F.3d 1124, 1127 (9th Cir. 1998). The petition cannot proceed because I cannot tell what claims are being raised.

26 The two-page petition does not adequately describe the claims. Petitioner states that he was not permitted to appear at an unspecified preliminary hearing. ECF No. 1 at 1. He does not state the purpose of the hearing, what proceedings it was connected to, or how his absence | negatively impacted his rights. Petitioner also claims that his Eighth Amendment right to be free | from cruel and unusual punishment is being violated but, again, does not explain how. Id. | Petitioner may amend his petition to better explain his claims. If he chooses to do so, he should | use the habeas form enclosed with this order.

5 It is ORDERED that: 6 1. Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 8, is granted.

7 2. Petitioner may file an amended petition within sixty days of this order’s entry. If | he does not, I will recommend that the current petition be dismissed for the reasons stated in this | order.

10 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to send petitioner a federal habeas form.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13 ( 1 ow — Dated: _ June 25, 2021 14 JEREMY D. PETERSON 15 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.