(PC) Gleason v. Lynch
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STANLEY GLEASON, No. 2:21-cv-00253-TLN-AC
Plaintiff, v. ORDER
JEFF LYNCH, et al.,
Defendants.
Plaintiff Stanley Gleason (“Plaintiff”), a former inmate at California State Prison – Sacramento, is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On May 19, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff has not filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 26 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Findings and Recommendations issued May 19, 2021 (ECF No. 7), are ADOPTED IN FULL, and
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: July 7, 2021 yy /) Sn ( Take ll Troy L. Nuhlep>
United States District Judge
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.