United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

Richardson, Jr. v. Ortiz

Richardson, Jr. v. Ortiz
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided July 27, 2021
Richardson, Jr. v. Ortiz

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VAN DARRIN RICHARDSON JR, Case No. 1:21-cv-00996 AWI JLT 12 Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK vs. OF COURT TO REOPEN THIS CASE AND TO 13 CLOSE THIS CASE AS TO PENSKE TRUCK RICHARD ORTIZ, et al., LEASING COMPANY ONLY 14 (Doc. 9) Defendants.

17 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed without prejudice as to Penske Truck Leasing Co. only and with each side to bear their own fees and costs. (Doc. 9) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court.

20 Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to reopen this case and to close this action as Penske Truck Leasing Co. only.

23 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 27, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 25 CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.