United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

Romero v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc

Romero v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided August 4, 2021
Romero v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAMUEL ROMERO, Case No. 1:20-cv-01490-DAD-BAM

Plaintiff, ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR

PROTECTIVE ORDER v.

(Doc. 31) WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1-10, inclusive,

Defendants.

On August 2, 2021, the parties filed a stipulated protective order. (Doc. 15.) Following review, the Court adopts the stipulated protective order. The parties are advised that pursuant to the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, any documents subject to the protective order to be filed under seal must be accompanied by a written request which complies with Local Rule 141 prior to sealing. The party making a request to file documents under seal shall be required to show good cause for documents attached to a non- dispositive motion or compelling reasons for documents attached to a dispositive motion. Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2009). Within five (5) days of any approved document filed under seal, the party shall file a redacted copy of the sealed document. The redactions shall be narrowly tailored to protect only the information that is confidential or was deemed confidential.

Additionally, the parties shall consider resolving any dispute arising under the protective order according to the Court’s informal discovery dispute procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 4, 2021 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.