(PC) Brady v. Jones

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PATRICK BRADY, No. 2:21-cv-00489-TLN-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER SCOTT JONES, et al., 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Patrick Brady (“Plaintiff”), a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20 On June 24, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 20.) On July 8, 2021, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 21.)

24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304(f), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). Having reviewed the file under the /// | applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by | the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued June 24, 2021 (ECF No. 20), are | ADOPTED IN FULL, 6 2. The First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), | without leave to amend for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and 8 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

9 IT IS SO ORDERED.

11 | DATED: August 4, 2021 2 / 8 “ \/ 14 — AWN < Troy L. Nunley } 15 United States District Judge