Chock v. Stryker Corporation

D. Joshua Staub, Bar No. 170568 Law Office of D. Joshua Staub 13015 Washington Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90066 Telephone: (310) 929-5269 Attorney for Plaintiff D. Malama Chock

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA D. MALAMA CHOCK, ) Case No. 1:21-CV-00996-DAD-JLT 11 ) Plaintiff, ) [PROPOSED] ORDER CLOSING 12 ) THE ACTION AS TO STRYER vs. ) ORTHOPAEDICS AND STRYKER 13 ) GMBH ONLY STRYKER CORPORATION, A ) MICHIGAN CORPORATION; ) (Doc. 9) STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS, AN ) ENTITY OF UNKNOWN FORM; ) STRYKER GMBH, A SWISS ) COMPANY, ) ) 17 Defendants. ) ) 1 [Proposed] Order 2 The parties stipulated to the action being dismissed as to Stryker Orthopaedics and Stryker GMBH only. (Doc. 11) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).

6 Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action as to Stryker Orthopaedics and Stryker GMBH only.

9 IT IS SO ORDERED.

10 Dated: August 9, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 11 CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE