Chock v. Stryker Corporation

D. Joshua Staub, Bar No. 170568

Law Office of D. Joshua Staub

13015 Washington Boulevard

Los Angeles, CA 90066

Telephone: (310) 929-5269

Attorney for Plaintiff D. Malama Chock

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

D. MALAMA CHOCK, ) Case No. 1:21-CV-00996-DAD-JLT )

Plaintiff, ) [PROPOSED] ORDER CLOSING ) THE ACTION AS TO STRYER vs. ) ORTHOPAEDICS AND STRYKER ) GMBH ONLY

STRYKER CORPORATION, A )

MICHIGAN CORPORATION; ) (Doc. 9)

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS, AN )

ENTITY OF UNKNOWN FORM; )

STRYKER GMBH, A SWISS )

COMPANY, ) )

Defendants. ) )

[Proposed] Order

The parties stipulated to the action being dismissed as to Stryker Orthopaedics and Stryker GMBH only. (Doc. 11) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action as to Stryker Orthopaedics and Stryker GMBH only.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 9, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE