(PC) Bell v. Warden

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KEVIN BELL, No. 2:21-cv-0534 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND WARDEN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendant.

17 By order filed June 30, 2021, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint.

20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case.

22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time || waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. || 1991).

3 || Dated: August 9, 2021 ( aie } ft | Ld (g—, 4 CAROLYN K DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE fi bell0534. fia 1]