United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

Tahoe Regional Planning Agency v. Mountain Addiction, LLC

Tahoe Regional Planning Agency v. Mountain Addiction, LLC
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided August 17, 2021
Tahoe Regional Planning Agency v. Mountain Addiction, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

1 JOHN L. MARSHALL (Cal. Bar No. 145570) TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY 128 Market Street Stateline Nevada, 89449 Tel: (775) 303-4882 [email protected] MARSHA A. BURCH (Cal. Bar No. 170298) LAW OFFICE OF MARSHA A. BURCH S. Auburn Street Grass Valley, CA 95945 Tel: (530) 272-8411 [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff Tahoe Regional Planning Agency UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY, ) Case No. 2:20-cv-00945-TLN-KJN ) Plaintiff, ) ) 14 vs. ) SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER ) TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER MOUNTAIN ADDICTION LLC, JUSTIN ) SHEAF, ) ) Judge: Honorable Troy L. Nunley Defendants. ) ) ) )

20 Pursuant to Local Rule 143 the parties stipulate and ask the Court to Order that the order entered on July 13, 2021 (Dkt. No. 30)1 be modified by extending the discovery and dispositive “Dkt. No.” refers to the docket number entry for the Court’s electronic filing system.

1 motions deadlines by an additional 120 days, to December 17, 2021, and June 20, 2022, respectively.

3 “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc. (9th Cir. 1992) 975 F.2d 604, 607 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Rule 16(b) provides that “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). “The schedule may be modified ‘if it cannot reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension.’” Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison Co. (9th Cir. 2002) 302 F.3d 1080, 1087 (quoting Johnson, 975 F.2d at 607).

10 Good cause exists for this extension. The parties have required some additional time to respond to discovery, and there has been cooperation in this regard.

12 For these reasons, the parties ask the Court to extend the discovery deadline to December 17, 2021, and the dispositive motion deadline to June 20, 2022.

15 DATED: August 16, 2021. Respectfully submitted, TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY By: /s/ John L. Marshall Attorney for Plaintiff, 18 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency [email protected] DATED: August 16, 2021. Respectfully submitted, 20 LAW OFFICE OF MARSHA A. BURCH 21 By: /s/ Marsha A. Burch 22 Attorney for Plaintiff, Tahoe Regional Planning Agency 23 [email protected] 1 DATED: August 16, 2021. Respectfully submitted, PORTER SIMON, 2 PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 3 By: /s/ Lou Basile 4 Attorney for Defendants, Mountain Addiction, LLC and 5 Justin Sheaf [email protected] IT IS SO ORDERED. The discovery deadline 1s extended to December 17, 2021, and the dispositive motion deadline is extended to June 20, 2022.

Dated: August 17, 2021 ry /) San Tok 4 i NMA 11 _ } aw Troy L. Nunley) } United States District Judge SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.