United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

(PS) Sayyedalhosseini v. USCIS Sacramento Field Office

(PS) Sayyedalhosseini v. USCIS Sacramento Field Office
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided August 27, 2021
(PS) Sayyedalhosseini v. USCIS Sacramento Field Office

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SONIA SAYYEDALHOSSEINI, No. 2:21-cv-0207 JAM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER USCIS SACRAMENTO FILED OFFICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Defendant.

Plaintiff Sonia Sayyedalhosseini is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Plaintiff commenced this action on February 2, 2021, by filing a complaint and paying the required filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) On March 1, 2021, plaintiff filed a purported proof of service on the defendant. (ECF No. 4.)

On April 20, 2021, pursuant to plaintiff’s request, the Clerk entered defendant’s default. (ECF No. 6.) On April 28, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment. (ECF No. 7.) On May 20, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion for citizenship. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff’s motions, however, were not noticed for hearing in violation of Local Rule 230. Moreover, the motions do not contain legal analysis and are essentially just a collection of exhibits. //// Most importantly, however, review of plaintiff’s purported proof of service on the defendant reflects that plaintiff attempted to serve the defendant personally and by mail at the USCIS Sacramento Field Office. (ECF No. 4 at 3.) Defendant, however, is an agency of the United States. Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that to serve an agency of the United States a plaintiff must not only send summons to the agency, but must also: (A)(i) deliver a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the United States attorney for the district where the action is brought--or to an assistant United States attorney or clerical employee whom the United States attorney designates in a writing filed with the court clerk--or (ii) send a copy of each by registered or certified mail to the civil- process clerk at the United States attorney’s office; (B) send a copy of each by registered or certified mail to the Attorney General of the United States at Washington, D.C.; and (C) if the action challenges an order of a nonparty agency or officer of the United States, send a copy of each by registered or certified mail to the agency or officer.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1). “A federal court does not have jurisdiction over a defendant unless the defendant has been served properly under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.” Direct Mail Specialists, Inc. v. Eclat Computerized Technologies, Inc., 840 F.2d 685, 688 (9th Cir. 1988).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of the Court shall vacate the entry of defendant’s default; 2. Plaintiff’s April 28, 2021 motion for default judgment (ECF No. 7) is denied without prejudice to renewal; 3. Plaintiff’s May 20, 2021 motion for citizenship (ECF No. 9) is denied without prejudice to renewal; 4. Plaintiff is granted sixty days to properly serve the defendant; and //// //// //// //// 5. Plaintiff is cautioned that the failure to timely comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

Dated: August 26, 2021

61 pips i ORAH BARNES oo UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DB/orders/orders.civil/sa yyeda lhosseinir4 (i).ord

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.