(PC) Veaver v. Honea

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WILLIAM F.B. VEAVER No. 2:20-cv-02554-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND KOREY HONEA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants.

17 By order filed February 3, 2021, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Following several extensions of time, the elapsed period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign this matter to a district court judge.

23 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings | and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified | time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 || (9th Cir. 1991).

4 | Dated: August 27, 2021 Card ke yy a 5 CAROLYN K DELANEY?

6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1] 12 12/veav2554. fta.docx