United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

(PC) Kyle v. California Victim Compensation Board

(PC) Kyle v. California Victim Compensation Board
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided August 27, 2021
(PC) Kyle v. California Victim Compensation Board

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONTA LADEAL KYLE, No. 2:21-cv-0479 KJM KJN P

Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA VICTIM COMPENSATION BOARD, ET AL.,

Defendants.

On June 7, 2021, the district court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend, granting plaintiff sixty days in which to file an amended complaint. Sixty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: August 27, 2021

' Foci) Aharon

KENDALL J. NE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Kyleo479.f1a

1]

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.